BAMBAR
Anti-Wrap Like You've
Never Seen
Written by:
Al
Bsharah
11/20/01
|
 |
The ultimate in anti-wrap solutions.
This bar does not bind, does not hinder articulation, does not cause
anti-squat, and does not make Jello out of your springs.
 |
As many of you have realized as your leaf-sprung rigs have
grown in size and strength, a problem occurs when tires get too big, lifts
get too tall, and obstacles get too difficult. It's called
spring-wrap. Mention it to a seasoned 4-wheeler, and he may cringe
with memories of carnage caused by it.
| Symptoms may include: |
 |
A bouncing rig |
 |
Slapping and clanging of metal |
 |
An inability to gain traction |
|
| Problems may include: |
 |
Bent, broken, or s-shaped springs |
 |
Broken drive shafts or busted u-joints |
 |
A vehicle put into a precarious situation |
 |
Bruised egos (can't have that!) |
|
| Standard anti-wrap systems have a v-shaped bar, positioned
horizontally, that stretches from the axle tube to a cross-member somewhere
near the transfer case. These bars are typically called anti-wrap
bars, or sometimes even traction bars. For our discussions,
anti-wrap is more appropriate. You can see this design in the
crude diagram to the right. Many of the solutions out there today substantially reduce
the effects of spring wrap, however, with this reduction comes a few
prices that are paid. Some of these characteristics may
include: |
 |
 |
Anti-Squat. This is a characteristic that's
difficult to explain on paper, but suffice it to say that when torque is
applied to this type of anti-wrap bar, forces are transferred downward onto
the axle. This causes the springs to arch and the rear of the
vehicle to rise, which leads to yet another bouncing effect that you were
trying to get rid of in the first place. These forces are shown in
the same diagram above. |
 |
Binding of the system. Binding is a bad thing.
Binding is the reason that many leaf-sprung Jeepers disconnect their
sway-bars and trac-bars (not to be confused with "traction bars"). Binding causes excessive
forces to be applied in places you do not want them applied to.
Traditional anti-wrap bars will induce varying forms of binding, depending
on their placement within the system and the types of mounting points
used. The problem is that most of the compensation for articulation
is handled by compression of bushings, instead of free-flowing movement. |
 |
Loss of articulation. Due to the binding of an
anti-wrap
system, you will significantly lose articulation in your vehicle. Try to
remember what it's like wheeling with sway-bars or a trac-bar. |
 |
Worse even, they may cause strange vehicular reactions
that are inconsistent from one side to the other. This is because
the anti-wrap bar must be mounted on one side of the vehicle. |
In 2001, I was in serious need of some form of anti-wrap
device. I was not satisfied with the solutions that were out there,
because I was not willing to compromise my Jeepability by inducing any of
the problems listed above. So, it was time to put the thinking cap on,
and pull out the dusty drawing board. Countless ideas were invented
and discarded, for one reason or another. No solution.
My brain alone simply wasn't enough to flesh out the ultimate design, so I
sent an email to two trusted friends (Matt Osburn and
Brad Kilby) regarding
the issue and found that they had been brainstorming a bit themselves.
There was a sudden slowing of the Internet as our emails flew, wicked
designs were created and tossed virtually back and forth. Crude images
were quickly drawn with MS Paint and discarded just as fast...ideas were
flowing, and a final concept was agreed upon. The initial concept had
a few extraneous complex items that I later discarded at the 11th hour during build,
but the concept was still the same. The concept is what allowed for
flex in all directions...NO binding. It gave the axle freedom to move
in the directions it was supposed to, while still eliminating wrap. It also
did not induce any form of anti-squat. Could it be the perfect
solution? What is this concept that is so striking, so versatile, and
so perfect?
Vertical.
Huh? As mentioned above, tradition anti-wrap devices are horizontal in
nature. This horizontal nature is what induces anti-squat. Also,
because it's horizontal it needs to be placed on ONE side or another from
the center of the axle - as the pinion and drive shaft are in the way.
Vertical allows for center placement for symmetry and ultimate flexibility that's best described with some
diagrams (yes, more crude drawings!)
The drawings below are color coded for easier viewing. All joints (be
they bushings or Delrin plastics) are noted in red. The anti-wrap bar
itself is black. Any Jeep parts are grey. The shackle for the
anti-wrap device is purple. As well, desired motion and compensation
are identified by blue and green respectively. Desired motion is the
direction the axle WANTS to move. The compensation is the direction of
forces, or where joints move when the desired motion is applied. So,
with that explained...let's check the system out:
How does the system
stop wrap? It can be seen in the diagram to the left. When
torque is applied to the axle, it will try to twist in the direction of
the blue arrows. The anti-wrap bar will translate this rotational
force into a directional one along the shackle. The shackle, being
of solid material, doesn't want to compress or expand, so it won't.
Thus, stopping the rotational forces. There will be slight
compression in the top and bottom joints. The taller the black bar
is, the better the system will reduce wrap. Note that anti-squat
forces are in the direction of the dark green arrow. The springs
will fight against this, so the results of this force are compensated
for and removed. |
Say you hit a
bump...how does the system compensate for this? Rotation happens
at the top two joints, and the rear portion of the shackle will go up
and down while the front portion stays affixed to a single point.
You will note in the installation photos below that my shackle rests at
a slight decline towards the rear. This was done because I run 2"
lift springs. When my springs compress upwards, the axle will move
towards the rear until they go flat and then invert...at which time the
axle will move forward. The shackle will follow this pattern of
moving the top of the bar backwards before forwards. Granted, this
movement is MUCH less than the axle, but it's a good idea to try and
correlate them somewhat. Any difference in this is compensated by
the springs, but is so minimal it's almost not worth considering.
Similarly, if you run flat springs your shackle should be flat at rest
as well. |
This is a
minimal movement, but occurs during bumps. During compression of
leaf springs, the shackle will move forward and backward, taking the
axle with it slightly. Again, this is a minimal movement that
occurs, but it needs to be compensated for. This is handled with a
slight rotation of the top rear joint. |
Articulation. The
moment you've all been waiting for! Quite simply, the bottom joint
will take 90% of the compensation duties...a nice free motion to allow
the axle to articulation all it wants. This bottom joint needs to
be perpendicular with the direction of articulation. For all
intents and purposes, this means parallel with the ground.
Remember that standard horizontal anti-wrap devices compress bushings
during flex, while this design allows free movement around the joint. |
Side to side
axle motion is another minimal movement, but again...these minimal
movements occur and need to be compensated for. This movement can
happen during articulation, or if a tire is pressed up against an obstacle and
the vehicle weight causes a shift. Compensation here is handled by
twisting of the bottom joint and slight compression on the top joints. |
One final minimal
movement that happens is when one side of the axle moves forward and the
other moves rearward. This occurs mostly during articulation.
Remember above where the spring shackle moving causes the axle to go
forward and backward slightly during bumps? The same effect occurs
during articulation...only instead of a "bump" where both sides are going up and
down, each side is going it's own direction. This causes one side
to move forward and the other backward. Compensation is entirely
in the top joints, with compression around the shackle. |
STEP BY STEP
| What follows are basic instructions on how to build
this particular anti-wrap device. The pictures below are of the
original prototype, and improvements have been made since then.
Some caveats to notice and take into consideration are the following: |
 | This is NOT for coil-sprung vehicles! You do not need an
anti-wrap device, as your control arms function in this regard.
This is for LEAF-SPRUNG vehicles ONLY! Sorry, sometimes you have
to say these things... |
 | You must have significant lift to your vehicle in order to make
this work. There must be considerable space between the top of
the axle and the bottom of your tub. The shorter this device is,
the less functional it will become. When building, make sure to
leave ample space between the top of the anti-wrap device and the
bottom of the tub...otherwise the device will punch through the tub
during hard bumps. |
 | The bottom portion of the anti-wrap bar should look like the
drawings above. You will see in the prototype photographs below
that there are two separate sets of bushings attaching to the axle.
Having a single bar, with a bushing on each end is the more desirable
and easier to build. |
 | The material in the bottom joints can be made of a tougher
material than bushings. This area does not need a large amount
of compression. With regular spring bushings in all
of the joints, there may be some compression that leads to what comes
across as a quick wobbling in certain high-load circumstances.
I've noticed it on sand hills. Changing the bottom joints to
Delrin is a good idea, and it will reduce compression considerably,
eliminating this wobbling. It's a plastic that has many of the
characteristics of metal, but won't generate the friction and
degradation that metal-to-metal surfaces will. |
 | The metal used in this prototype was 1.250" schedule 80 PIPE (not
tubing). It happened to be laying around, and the stock spring
bushings used were easy to slide in for a fit. It would probably
be a good idea to use something a little tighter to put some
pre-compression on the bushings. This will also help to reduce
any wobbling effects. |
|
As usual, thanks to
Steve McKay for his superb welding abilities and facilities!
|
STEP 1 - CUT SOME METAL Cut the metal
into chunks that can be used for bushings. |
 |
STEP 2 - FIND SOME BUSHINGS Fit the
bushings into place, as shown here. |
 |
STEP 3 - BUILD A TRUSS A truss will need
to be built onto the axle for additional support. Shown here are
what mount to the axle, and will mount to the truss shown later. |
 |
Position the truss mounts as shown, being
sure that notches and/or clearance for things such as brake
lines are available (see the notch in the center-bottom portion). |
 |
|
 |
A bar was bent to fit between the truss
mounts, and welded into place above the axle (but not touching it). |
 |
STEP 4 - WELD TO CAST?! Tabs were
attached to both the truss and the cast of the differential.
Welding to cast is not an easy task, and requires a skilled welder.
Do NOT try this if you do not know what you are doing. Incorrectly
doing this, and cracking your differential because of it would be quite
painful to your pocketbook. You've been warned! |
 |
You can see that a steel plate was welded
to the differential, and the tabs were then welded to the steel.
In this picture the bushings have been added and fitted. Note that
some of the original caveats for the bottom section included changing
the bushings to Delrin, and only using a single long joint (instead of
the two shorter ones shown here). |
 |
|
 |
STEP 5 - BUILD THE A-FRAME Tack-weld
everything into place in order to correctly position the a-frame.
The rear bar should be vertical and as close to directly above the axle
tube as possible. This will maximize it's ability to do its job! |
 |
The bottom joints need to be parallel to
the ground! If they're angled in any way, they will bind up during
articulation. This is important! |
| |
STEP 6 - BUILD A CROSS MEMBER There's no
direct picture for this, but you will see it in the below steps.
This cross member went between the frame rails. Also not shown in
the pictures below are additional supports that were added. I will
mention those once you get to the pictures below. |
 |
STEP 7 - BUILD A BIG SHACKLE We used
some flat metal to build long shackles for the top portion. |
 |
Cut 'em, grind 'em, drill 'em, and put 'em into
place. Voila, you're nearly done! |
 |
The extra support mentioned in STEP 6
included adding two supports, both starting from the left and right of
where the shackle mounts to the cross member. From there, they
angled back to the frame at a 45 degree angle and were affixed there. The forces
generated by this traction bar are massive, and the cross member WILL
need that additional support to keep it from bending. Trust me,
about five stop/go tests on the pavement tweaked the original one beyond
usage! They aren't shown here, but put 'em in! |
 |
|
 |
STEP 8 - TEST IT! Here you can see the
system under some articulation. |
 |
ADDITIONAL PHOTOGRAPHS These two
photographs are from Will Robinson's (Danger) implementation. He's
running a low-pinion D44 (vs. the high-pinion D60 shown above).
He's also implemented the single bottom joint, as recommended, and is
using Delrin bushings for the bottom joint. |
 |
He's also got a big bad-ass V8 that used
to munch up drive shafts for lunch. Since then, the beast has been
tamed! |
That pretty much sums it up! If you would like to see
all of the other cool pictures (welding shots, etc) taken during this installation, you may do so by
clicking
HERE.
 |